Categories
Truly Free Film

Are you ready to ride DARK HORSE?

Perhaps you have already heard….. We are taking Todd Solondz’s latest film to Venice, Toronto, Deauville and a few other festivals. This is Todd’s 1ST film without a rape, molestation, masturbation, or anything truly icky. Well… If it wasn’t for the language I think we’d get a PG rating. We don’t anticipate having it in theaters in the US until springtime, but I do have a few things related to this pony to amuse you along the way (and even more to come).

What’s it all about? Well…
Thirty-something guy with arrested development falls for thirty-something girl with arrested development, but moving out of his junior high school bedroom proves too much. Tragedy ensues.

Who is in it?
Justin Bartha, Selma Blair, Zachary Booth, Mia Farrow, Jordan Gelber, Aasif Mandvi, Donna Murphy, Christopher Walken, and others.

Who were some of our brilliant collaborators?
I produced it with Derrick Tseng. Nick Quested was our Executive Producer.
Cinematography: Andrij Parekh
Production Design: Alex DiGerlando
Editor: Kevin Messman
Casting: Ann Goulder & Gayle Keller
Costume Design: Kurt and Bart
Production: Craig Shilowich (Craig was our Assoc. Producer, Production Mgr. AND Post Supervisor — how awesome is that!).
Poster: Andrew Percival and Mojo
Sales: Penny Wolf / Goldcrest Films

Where can you see it? Well come to Venice. It’s really beautiful there.
Official Premiere In Competition Screenings
Press & Industry Screening – Sunday, 4 September @ 19:30h – Sala Darsena
Official Screening – Monday, 5 September @ 22:15h – Sala Grande
Public Screening – Monday, 5 September @ 22:30h – Palabiennale
Press & Industry Screening – Tuesday, 6 September @ 11:45h – Palabiennale

I know Venice is expensive, and we are all under budget restraints so maybe you can come in Toronto?
PRESS & INDUSTRY 1 SCOTIABANK THEATRE 2 SATURDAY, 10 SEPT 3:00PM
PUBLIC 1 VISA SCREENING ROOM (ELGIN) SUNDAY, 11 SEPT 2:30PM
PUBLIC 2 ISABEL BADER THEATRE MONDAY, 12 SEPT 4:45PM
PRESS & INDUSTRY 2 SCOTIABANK THEATRE 2 WEDNESDAY, 14 SEPT 7:45PM
PUBLIC 3 ISABEL BADER THEATRE SATURDAY, 17 SEPT 6:45PM

Okay, maybe travel will be a bit hard, but there’s still ways to hop on the ride…
Our first clip:

Yes, our first trailer will be forthcoming.

Todd on Twitter (although he doesn’t use it).
http://twitter.com/#!/toddsolondz

Our Facebook Page:
http://www.facebook.com/darkhorsemovie

Our IMDB Page where you can add it to your Watchlist.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1690455/

Some blog posts I like where you can see how Todd is responsible for all of indie film and all of the cool poster designs of recent years.

Want more? Well, I have had the pleasure of collaborating with Todd many times in many ways through the years. I love this film. It is both pure Solondz and something that represents a leap in his art. And it is really really a lot of fun — and truly emotional. It surprises me in new ways with each viewing. When we are awarding the “Cinematic Treasures” medals, Todd should be an early recipient.

Categories
Truly Free Film

How Does Everyone Expect Filmmakers To Promote Movies?

Filmmakers know that Indie Films are sold on their back. Filmmakers know that it benefits their films and their careers to promote their movies. Filmmakers also recognize that they spend on the average two years developing their films, generally unpaid. And filmmakers also realize they are asked to spend eighteen months to two years promoting and publicizing their films, ALSO UNPAID.

If we don’t figure out a way to pay for these crucial services, the indie film biz is doomed. Even more so, if we don’t find a way to weave this recognition into the discussions with sales agents, distributors, and talent representatives, we are covering up one of the necessary truths.

I try to help my movies in every way I can. I think all producers and directors do that. Well, okay 90% of them. I think sales agents and distributors see that. I think they do likewise. Well, okay, 90% of them. But I don’t hear it in their conversations or actions with me.

It is not easy to go back to relationships one has built over years and say “what I just told you was doable, and is industry standard, well now we can’t do it.” “I know you are used to getting it this way, but that is the old way”, “Indie film is the new theatre, in that you do it for love and art and not money — but yes others make money at the same time”. Nor do I like going to those, like GC, who have given beyond what the deal was, and saying “I need you to do more” or “I need you to give again”. Believe me, I wouldn’t do it, if I did not have to. I put my reputation, relationships, and financial well being on the line all the time.

And I know the sales agents and distributors do likewise. I recognize all that they do, and I hope you know I appreciate it. But it doesn’t change the realities of the situations we are in. Nor does it ease the conflict when they take me out for that rare nice dinner and I know it — like ten others that I won’t participate in — are going to get charged back to my movie.

Some films are more difficult than others. It’s that curse when you deliver a film that gets into competition at one of the A List festivals. Okay, it is a wonderful curse, but in some real ways, A list festival acceptance is very much a curse. There are costs involved that one just doesn’t expect will ever get paid back.

It is even harder nowadays when the producing and directing fees on such films don’t pay you enough to live. Maximum producing fees on indie films are generally 5% of the budget — and most earn less. Frequently writing/directing fees are tied to the producer fees. And we spend about two years minimu developing, packaging, financing a film. Add a year to make it, and for the director 18 months to two years promoting it. That is five years of work. On a $3M movie (if one can be as fortunate enough to raise that kind of money) that breaks down to a whopping $30K/year salary. That is less than my Mom earned teaching community college 35 years ago. No wonder everyone needs a second job. Luckily for producers, we often can find a way to make a film each year, and still try to handle the other 4 or so films that are either in development or release. That is not the same for directors. They only get to do one film at a time.

If I had a distribution or sales company, I would build in a percentage fee so that the director could afford to do publicity, but that’s just me dreaming the world could be different.

I have to tell my directors a hundred million times or so that we don’t have the money for what they need to do the work I and others request of them daily. What is a producer supposed to do when a director’s request is directly related to work on the film, but the budget or sales cap doesn’t allow for it. If the film doesn’t pay it, it will come out of the director’s and my pockets, threadbare as they are. I contextualize the situation clearly for my collaborators so I know they wouldn’t ask if it wasn’t necessary. The people I choose to work with are generally not demanding or greedy personalities. They are trying to find ways to survive and still do the work required.

Yet the industry says they can’t pay for it. I know everyone values the work. So where does this leave us? Don’t we need to find a better way?

Why aren’t the sales agents and distributors and PRODUCERS and the talent representatives trying to find a way to do something about it? The culture and business we love depends on it. We are all in this together. Isn’t it time we spoke openly about it?

As we head into the Fall Festivals, a lot of people are going to be frustrated, disappointed, and resentful because we keep ignoring all the elephants in the room.

Categories
Truly Free Film

Is So Much Choice Really Any Choice At All?

So many people want to “keep their options open” as opposed to actually committing themselves to something they really believe in. We fill our shelves with 1001 variations and some people think it is freedom, but doesn’t it just obscure the real problem that we haven’t committed to what we really want?

(image via Flavorpill & Brian Ulrich)

Of course having extremely limited choice is far from freedom too.

Categories
Truly Free Film

Must Read On MovieScope: Michael Gubbins’ “Face The Music”

I have had the pleasure of participating in two think tanks sessions with Michael Gubbins of the UK. He’s a fun and thoughtful advocate for the change that needs to occur in our industry, if we want to survive. As he points out today in his article in MovieScope “Face The Music”, ten years after the release of the iPod, has the film biz really learned anything from it’s sister, the music industry?

In MovieScope, Michael points out:

….film, where there has been a polarisation of the global blockbusters at one hand and ever-smaller art-house releases at the other. A fine film with critical acclaim can still struggle to find any traction in the market. The independent sector will struggle with the critical mass of sales to create a business model, and an on-demand world of easy access to the whole history of film at the push of a button looks likely to make life tougher—if not impossible—for a significant proportion of independent producers.

The ‘Experience’ Business
One of the ironies of this era of ubiquitous access has been the increased emphasis on those areas of the business that were supposed to be killed off by it. For music, the growth area has been live performance. Estimates suggest that easily the largest proportion of those who work in the music industry are working in festivals and concerts. It is also the area which is continuing to attract significant private equity, bringing impressive returns on investment.

Live is not a direct equivalent of theatrical; the cinema is tending to act in recent years as the marketing platform for the profit centres of DVD. But it does suggest that in a world of instant perfect copies available on demand, there is increased want for the exclusive and authentic. In music, this is not just about live performance, but about merchandising and memorabilia.

Film has some of these same opportunities, not just in cinema but in much of the under-exploited metadata of production that may have value to consumers. These rely on a direct relationship with audiences and the retention—or at least a bigger interest—in rights, particularly given that the European Commission seems increasingly against territorial rights and licensing based on national borders. It also suggests the need to reassess the windows of exploitation…

We need to work harder at our solutions. It is not going to come from a series of individual efforts, or even a national campaign. If we care about the culture of film, the studios need to support the independents, we need to embrace experimentation with business models, throw off the liability of legacy, and truly improve the experience for audiences. We need to become a real community and not just a bunch of different, somewhat related enterprises.

Read Michael’s full article here on MovieScope.

Categories
Truly Free Film

Sheri Candler on “New Online Distribution Service: Prescreen”

Don’t you love it when you see something new and it all makes sense. I had the opportunity to view the new distribution platform PRESCREEN and I dug it. I was all set to tell you all about it when I learned they sponsored the book Selling Your Film Without Selling Your Soul , and as a result Sheri Candler spoke to them and quizzed them on what they were up to. How sweet is that: all the info you need, clear and simple, and I don’t have to write anything. Love it. Check it out. Prescreen is just one of many new exciting new tools and partners coming for indie filmmakers who want to step into Direct Distribution.

The following post first appeared on the Selling Your Film Without Selling Your Soul blog to spotlight Prescreen as the Presenting Sponsor of that soon to be published book.

Prescreen was recently launched and is now taking film submissions to be considered for their service. Thus far, if you visited their web page, you were asked to submit an email address to be kept informed of their activities. Prescreen curates films and distributes them via a daily email to an opt-in audience. While they have started accepting applications for films to be showcased on their site, but they will not accept every film. “Unlike some of the other services that currently exist, we will not be a sea of titles. We will do our best to try and create signal out of noise,” said founder and CEO Shawn Bercuson.

What will PreScreen mean for the indie filmmaker?

“For the indie filmmaker, Prescreen means you now have a viable alternative to distribution. That said, we do not intend to replace any of the existing channels, we are merely a tool to help make the marketing and distribution efforts much easier. Being featured on Prescreen means revenue instead of marketing spend, analyzing demographics of *your* audience instead of looking at the audience of comparable titles, and increasing the potential to go ‘viral.’ We give the filmmaker and distributor relevant information that they can use to maximize the success of each title.”

“We believe there is a lot of great content that exists that never finds a home or has a hard time reaching the right audience. As we all know, movie distribution has historically been a very arduous and risky endeavor for filmmakers, distributors, or studios alike; however, we now live in a world with exciting technology that enables us to communicate in real time with…everyone. If you use these tools correctly, the supply vs. demand curve can be shifted. Whereas, before content was created, money was spent, and hours of work were completed prior to the release of a film trying to create demand for a title; we can now gauge demand at the beginning of the process such that the entire endeavor is more efficient.”

Will the service cost anything, either for filmmakers or for audience? If so, what?

“For moviegoers, it is free to signup to receive the Prescreen daily email. If a movie catches your eye, you have the opportunity to ‘rent’ the movie to stream. Each movie we feature lives on Prescreen for 60 days. On Day 1, the movie costs $4 and you’ll have up to 60 days to view the film; while on Days 2 – 60, the movie costs $8 and you’ll have 60 – (x days) to complete the film. Though a moviegoer has up to 60 days to complete the film, ‘renting’ on Prescreen is similar to that of any other the other mainstream steaming services and you’ll have 48 hours to complete the film once you start the stream.”

“Why only 60 days? Movies live on Prescreen for 60 days for many reasons. First, to allow a film to capture (and capitalize on) the word-of-mouth exposure that organically ensues throughout the social graph. Movies are inherently social. If all my friends are talking about a specific title, I don’t like to be left out of the conversation and I’ll want to partake. 60 days allows people to join the conversation. The second reason is piracy. As iTunes has successfully proven with the music industry, people are happy to pay for content as long as they have access to it. For example, if a movie is screening in 6 cities not named Omaha, Nebraska and I live in Omaha, my only option is to illegally download that title. 60 days allows access to content that people might otherwise be forced to get through illegal means.”

“For filmmakers and distributors, there is no out of pocket charge at any point throughout the entire Prescreen process. Prescreen is only successful if the movie is successful. Prescreen will send the filmmaker a check for 50% of the revenue generated from the sales on Prescreen along with a ‘Prescreen Performance Report’ that details all of the relevant information a filmmaker or distributor would need to continue to reach the targeted audience including: a Prescreen performance summary, detailed demographic information, the size of the addressable market, and suggested continued marketing plan.”

*NOTE*: Prescreen has a strict privacy policy that protects all of the personal information of its subscribers. All information shared with the filmmaker or distributor is aggregated and does not compromise any personal or contact information that could lead to any unwanted use or abuse.

“At any given point in time, Prescreen has up to 60 films featured on the site: 1 featured film and the 59 previous featured films. As one movie enters our library through their feature, another one leaves. After 60 days, the filmmaker should have enough data points and insight to continue to market their film effectively and reach the right audience.”

How does one sign up for an account?

“For filmmakers and distributors, visit prescreen.com/submit. Here, you can submit your film to Prescreen to be the ‘Featured Film.’ The featured film is the highlight of our daily email that goes out to all of our subscribers and will also be the only film on our homepage for 24 hours.”

On what devices is the service geared toward viewing?

“We believe that movies should live where moviegoers want to see them. Because of this, Prescreen plans to be platform agnostic and live on the web, mobile, and other connected devices like streaming TV’s, gaming consoles, and set top boxes. However, as any Prescreen engineer will tell you: ‘Rome wasn’t built in a day’ so we’ll start on the web and prioritize platforms based on where our audience is telling us to go.”

If you are interested in having your film considered for the service, please submit it here before August 12. For more information regarding Selling Your Film Without Selling Your Soul, please visit the website, Like us on Facebook and follow our Twitter stream #syfnotsys.

Categories
Truly Free Film

Six Recommendations to Start Watching Chinese Independent (Microbudget) Cinema Now

Now you know what all indies can learn from watching Chinese Indies, right? If not, then you need to read Karin Chien’s post from yesterday. So how do you drill down deeper this knowledge boost? Well, Kevin Lee, dGenerate Films’ VP of Programming and Education, has been kind enough to generate a list for us.

Check out these film and experience the diversity of Global Microbudget Cinema!

Six Recommendations to Start Watching Chinese Independent (Microbudget) Cinema Now
by Kevin Lee, dGenerate Films VP of Programming and Education

OXHIDE 2 by Liu Jiayin
Available on DVD through our website: http://dgeneratefilms.com/catalog/oxhide-ii-niu-pi-ii/

DISORDER by Huang Weikai
Only available institutionally via DVD or download:

GHOST TOWN by Zhao Dayong:
Available streaming on Amazon:
http://dgeneratefilms.com/catalog/ghost-town-fei-cheng/

MEISHI STREET by Ou Ning:
Available streaming on Amazon / Indieflix / Fandor:
http://dgeneratefilms.com/catalog/meishi-street-mei-shi-jie/
Fandor: http://www.fandor.com/films/meishi_street

UNKNOWN PLEASURES by Jia Zhangke:
Netflix DVD or Streaming: http://movies.netflix.com/WiMovie/Unknown_Pleasures/60027206?trkid=2361637

PETITION
Only avail institutionally on DVD from Cinema Guild:
http://cinemaguild.com/catalog/index.html?http%3A//cinemaguild.com/mm5/merchant.mvc%3FScreen%3DPROD%26Store_Code%3DTCGS%26Product_Code%3D2380

Ted: P.S. The New Yorker’s Richard Brody (author of “Everything Is Cinema: The Films of Jean Luc Godard”) chimed in on Facebook & Twitter and recommended we all check out the films of Ying Liang; he wrote about them here.

Categories
Truly Free Film

Hal Siegal on “Watching Games and Playing Films”

We are at in incredible time in our indie film culture. The distinct poles at which is perceived have never been more distant. Great things are getting done. Experiments are happening. And people are sharing. Whew!

Since my initial invite upon viewing his “social” film, Hal Siegal has contributed several times to this blog — and each time opened my mind up. So what if you think you don’t play games. Hal makes a good case of why they are already a part of every filmmakers bag of tricks.

Films are a serious business. Truth, dreams, joy, pain, love, hate. This is the spectrum along which we seek to find our art and our humanity. But we aren’t just the animals that tell stories. We are also the animals that create change. Our stories aren’t changing, but the ways we tell them are.

I
The shoddy video clip above is from LAST YEAR AT MARIENBAD, and the game being played is a variant of an old, classic game called Nim.

Call us authors, auteurs, readers, viewers, participants or just “friends”—what we seek, what we have always sought, is engagement. If the images that flicker across the retina do not inspire, if they are only cause without effect, then we as creators—as filmmakers—have failed. But you know this.

III
Nim, although ancient, is still quite fun to play. That is, until you discover that it is a mathematical game. If you know the math, you can’t lose.

Games are many things, but serious is not usually considered to be one of them. We play games because they are fun. Period. Unlike films, games don’t challenge our assumptions, and they don’t make us uncomfortable (except when we lose at them). And yet, if games are fun, then consider: where exactly does the fun happen? Games, like films, are delivered straight to the cerebral cortex. Games and films are ultimately emotional. The mechanics are not really so different.

IIIII
Or vice versa: if you don’t know the math, then you can’t win. This of course is one aspect of the symbolism of the game within the film.

I had mentioned this in a previous post: films are like games we play in our heads. Or as David Mamet succinctly puts it in Bambi Versus Godzilla, the only thing that really matters is creating a desire to know what happens next (I’m paraphrasing). In stories, more often than not, we do this by withholding information for a time. There is another, common name for this in the world of game design: a puzzle. (INCEPTION’S ending was so frustrating to many viewers because it was essentially a puzzle with a missing piece, and this drives people crazy). The point is: games may just provide a framework and opportunity for engagement at a level that was before unreachable via a traditional film.

IIIIIII
It’s merely a coincidence that the video clip above is originally from a film, which is playing on a television, that has been re-recorded with a cheap digital video camera and then uploaded to YouTube.

Where to begin then? By acknowledging that films aren’t just going digital. Films are going SOFTWARE. This is the next, inevitable step. Once a film becomes software, there are new opportunities for experimentation and manipulation. Software has inputs and outputs. Software isn’t fixed; it can change over time. As a result, we must rethink the role of the writer and the director: where will you give up control? where are the points of input? Where and how and in what new ways will you engage with your audience? Games already do this.

A suggestion: allow yourself to be inspired by games. However: don’t be intimidated by them. Beg, borrow, and definitely steal from them. But DON’T make games. Keep telling stories. Tell them in new ways.

Hal Siegel is a partner in Murmur, a hybrid studio/technology company that creates and distributes social films. He wrote and directed HIM, HER AND THEM.